One of the most difficult problems for a historical analysis is to avoid taking two words or ideas that exist during two different eras and assume that the words or ideas are synonyms. As we saw in the last post ordinary language philosophers, such as Ludwig Wittgenstein, created a philosophy that examined the usage of the words to avoid ambiguity between a word in different contexts. For Wittgenstein, the use of language is called a language-game (Philosophical Investigations, pg 10). Wittgenstein uses the term 'description' and how that term refers to "description of a body's position by means of its co-ordinates; description of a facial expression; description of a sensation of touch; of a mood". Hence, the ambiguity comes from the inability to know what the term is referring to.
Too often political ideologies are based on assumptions and not rooted in empirical fact or logical analysis. This blog will critique the ideologies of conservatism and libertarianism using philosophical, historical, and scientific ideas, while fleshing out why progressivism is an acceptable alternative. The main area of concern will be the comparison of the U.S. Founding period and current policy of economics, religion, and regulation of personal behavior.
Establishment Anglicans dunking dissenting Baptist preacher in VA
Showing posts with label Constitutions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Constitutions. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Declaration Of Independence (D.O.I): Part 1
Labels:
9th Amendment,
Bill Of Rights,
Christianity,
Constitutions,
D.O.I,
Gingrich,
Hamilton,
Hannity,
J. Adams,
J. Wilson,
Jefferson,
Madison,
P.Henry,
Quine,
R.H. Lee,
Religious Freedom,
Rights,
Wittgenstein
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)