One of the most difficult problems for a historical analysis is to avoid taking two words or ideas that exist during two different eras and assume that the words or ideas are synonyms. As we saw in the last post ordinary language philosophers, such as Ludwig Wittgenstein, created a philosophy that examined the usage of the words to avoid ambiguity between a word in different contexts. For Wittgenstein, the use of language is called a language-game (Philosophical Investigations, pg 10). Wittgenstein uses the term 'description' and how that term refers to "description of a body's position by means of its co-ordinates; description of a facial expression; description of a sensation of touch; of a mood". Hence, the ambiguity comes from the inability to know what the term is referring to.
Too often political ideologies are based on assumptions and not rooted in empirical fact or logical analysis. This blog will critique the ideologies of conservatism and libertarianism using philosophical, historical, and scientific ideas, while fleshing out why progressivism is an acceptable alternative. The main area of concern will be the comparison of the U.S. Founding period and current policy of economics, religion, and regulation of personal behavior.
Establishment Anglicans dunking dissenting Baptist preacher in VA
Showing posts with label Hamilton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hamilton. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Declaration Of Independence (D.O.I): Part 1
Labels:
9th Amendment,
Bill Of Rights,
Christianity,
Constitutions,
D.O.I,
Gingrich,
Hamilton,
Hannity,
J. Adams,
J. Wilson,
Jefferson,
Madison,
P.Henry,
Quine,
R.H. Lee,
Religious Freedom,
Rights,
Wittgenstein
Sunday, January 6, 2013
Introduction
Hello! Welcome to my blog. As my first post I will introduce myself and describe what this blog will cover. My name is Brian and I am 33 years old. I am a resident of the great city of Pittsburgh. My educational background began at Slippery Rock University where I majored in English and had a minor in philosophy. After I graduated I was uncertain what direction I wanted my life to go. During this time I became interested in politics, especially the role of religion in politics thanks to Fox's Bill O'Reilly and his 'War On Christmas'. It was at this time that I began to formulate my political views as a social Progressive. By this I mean that all choices of an individual ought to be deemed outside the scope of government interference and that our duties as citizens ought to be continually on guard to protect minority groups and their freedom to choose and their freedom to be who they are without condemnation (i.e. homosexual, socialist, Islamic, etc.).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)